McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Cravens CA4/1
- Soroush-Azar v. Palmer CA4/1
- People v. Bonaparte CA4/1
- Borrelli v. Scott CA4/1
- In re S.J. CA4/1
- People v. Kueny CA4/1
- Lugo v. Good Guys Auto Sales CA4/1
- In re Natalie B. CA4/1
- Yang v. Regents CA4/1
- The People v. Corlley CA4/1
- Soroush-Azar v. Palmer CA4/1
- In re Z.L. CA4/1
- The People v. Huynh CA4/1
- Image 2000 Multimedia, Inc. v. Quin CA4/1
- The People v. Kirby CA4/1
- Interinsurance Exchange v. Barrientos CA4/1
- Reilly v. Greenwald & Hoffman CA4/1
- In re D.A. CA4/1
- In re C.P. CA4/1
- In re J.R. CA4/1
- The People v. Ortiz CA4/1
- The People v. Peralta CA4/1
- Michael C. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- P. v. Smeltzer CA4/1
- Buckley v. De Jong CA4/1