McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re H.R. CA4/1
- People v. Sorisho CA4/1
- Friends of Aviara v. City of Carlsbad CA4/1
- Marcisz v. Ultrastar Cinemas CA4/1
- Suarez v. City of Corona
- Ervin v. Ben-Nun CA4/1
- People v. Dambrose CA4/1
- Gilbert v. County of San Bernardino CA4/1
- People v. Dambrose CA4/1
- In re Daniel M. CA4/1
- Croteau v. Bernier CA4/1
- Willow Bend v. City of Holtville CA4/1
- People v. Weese CA4/1
- Coalition etc. Del Mar Beach Club v. Del Mar Beach Club Owners Assn. CA4/1
- In re Gabriel S. CA4/1
- Angelica Textile Services v.Park CA4/1
- In re Justin W. CA4/1
- People v. Brown CA4/1
- San Diego Gas & Electric Company v. Schmidt
- People v. Duarte CA4/1
- People v. Mason CA4/1
- Conservatorship of Mayo CA4/1
- In re Jordan W. CA4/1
- People v. Naranjo CA4/1
- People v. Evans CA4/1