McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Wilkerson v. Sullivan
- Saffro v. Elite Racing, Inc.
- Westerfield v. Superior Court
- KIMBERLY R. v. Superior Court
- Stephens v. Superior Court
- Sharon S. v. Superior Court
- Jabro v. Superior Court
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Alaska Insurance
- People v. Winters
- Villafana v. CAMCO PACIFIC CONST. CO.
- People v. Gordon
- City of San Diego v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- Service Employees International Union v. Superior Court
- People v. Protsman
- Ferreira v. GRAY, CARY, WARE & FREIENDRICH
- Nafsu v. Hurd
- Expressions at Rancho Niguel Ass'n v. Ahmanson Devs., Inc.
- EXPRESSIONS AT RANCHO NIGUEL ASS'N v. Ahmanson Developments, Inc.
- Morris v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.
- Hooser v. Superior Court
- Malish v. City of San Diego
- Rothschild v. Tyco Internationall (US), Inc.
- Coscia v. McKenna & Cuneo
- Health & Human Services Agency v. Helen T.
- In Re Diamond H.