McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Sorisho CA4/1
- People v. Aparicio
- Hernandez v. W.R. Thomas CA4/1
- People v. Davis Ca4/1
- People v. Henderson CA4/1
- People v. Hupp CA4/1
- People v. Ulloa CA4/1
- People v. Edwards CA4/1
- People v. Aparicio
- City of San Diego v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- Herrera v. Modular Properties CA4/1
- In re Jamie S. CA4/1
- People v. Hunt CA4/1
- People v. Swaim CA4/1
- Ecolite Concrete USA v. G.S. Levine Ins. Services CA4/1
- Montgomery v. Klinedinst CA4/1
- People v. Smith CA4/1
- Hooper v. Ticor Title Ins. CA4/1
- In re Charles P. CA4/1
- Grayton v. CarMax Auto Superstores CA4/1
- In re Jason R. CA4/1
- Chen v. Jordan CA4/1
- In re Jack D. CA4/1
- People v. Chenda CA4/1
- In re J.H. CA4/1