McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re J.D. CA4/1
- People v. Reed CA4/1
- People v. Chamu CA4/1
- People v. Riley CA4/1
- People v. Bradley CA4/1
- In re G.D. CA4/1
- In re D.K. CA4/1
- In re E.C. CA4/1
- Fairview Valley Fire v. CA Dept. of Forestry
- People v. Williams CA4/1
- People v. Blaylock CA4/1
- Galicia v. Spencer CA4/1
- R.M. v. T.A.
- Klat v. Evans Tire & Service CA4/1
- People v. Mason CA4/1
- Garcia v. Cal. Dept. of Corrections etc. CA4/1
- Trejo v. Arriaga CA4/1
- People v. Nelson CA4/1
- SLPR, LLC v. Superior Court CA4/1
- Garcia v. Cal. Dept. of Corrections & Rehabilitation CA4/1
- In re Emmanuel E. CA4/1
- People v. Fordley CA4/1
- People v. Hall CA4/1
- People v. Holiday CA4/1
- People v. Johnson CA4/1