McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Peake v. Underwood
- People v. Lewis CA4/1
- In re A.H. CA4/1
- Estate of Buser Trust CA4/1
- In re D.D. CA4/1
- In re M.L. CA4/1
- Vitale v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney CA4/1
- Cameron D. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- Lillibridge v. Kennington CA4/1
- Jones v. County of San Diego CA4/1
- Magana v. Adame CA4/1
- Vissuet v. Bank of America CA4/1
- Pecanic v. Sumitomo Elec. Interconnect Products CA4/1
- In re Elijah W. CA4/1
- Caldwell v. Ecobaby Organics CA4/1
- Vafai v. Weisman CA4/1
- People v. Shipman CA4/1
- Gildelatorre v. Bay Vista Methodist Heights CA4/1
- In re Marriage of Boyd CA4/1
- BRS-Tustin Safeguard Assoc. v. Itherx Pharma, Inc. CA4/1
- People v. Burgos CA4/1
- People v. Seneca Ins. Co. CA4/1
- Sandra C. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- People v. Perez CA4/1
- People v. Ho CA4/1