McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Covarrubias
- People v. Trujillo CA4/1
- Marriage of Pearl and Gerber CA4/1
- In re Ramiro v. CA4/1
- People v. Grey CA4/1
- People v. Solorzano CA4/1
- People v. Torres CA4/1
- Armenta v. First American Fund Control CA4/1
- Chong v. Navarro CA4/1
- Passerelle v. Palomar Community College Dist. CA4/1
- Spanish Inn v. Goodell CA4/1
- People v. Pardo CA4/1
- Ritchie v. River Ranch CA4/1
- Sefton v. Sefton
- Douglas v. Edwards CA4/1
- In re I.H. CA4/1
- McKeown v. DMV CA4/1
- P. v.Barreno CA4/1
- In re A.B. CA4/1
- People v. Coyle CA4/1
- Flethez v. San Bernardino Co. Employees Retirement Assn.
- In re Jasmine O. CA4/1
- P.v. Chavez CA4/1
- People v. Hill CA4/1
- In re Kylee R. CA4/1