McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Ybarra CA4/1
- Pulido v. Cemak Trucking CA4/1
- People v. Davidson CA4/1
- People v. Hill CA4/1
- People v. Sandoval CA4/1
- Richardson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. CA4/1
- Doe v. San Diego Imperial Council
- Rancho Pauma Mutual Water Co. v. Yuima Municipal Water District
- In re Kimberly E. CA4/1
- People v. Ayon CA4/1
- In re Ferguson CA4/1
- Marriage of Gallegos CA4/1
- People v. Henning CA4/1
- Navarrete v. Meyer
- In re Anthony B. CA4/1
- Steiger v. Steiger CA4/1
- In re A.H. CA4/1
- In re D.R. CA4/1
- People v. Washic CA4/1
- People v. Spencer CA4/1
- Marriage of Furrh CA4/1
- People v. Carreon CA4/1
- Mitchell v. Delphinus Engineering, Inc. CA4/1
- People v. Hamilton CA4/1
- In re G.B. CA4/1