Marissa A. Bejarano
D+
58% — 19 of 33 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 68% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
26cases reviewed on appeal
35%reversed, in whole or part, of 23 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 15 reversed 6 reversed in part 2 writ granted 1 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 2023 10 · 2022 9 · 2024 5 · 2026 1 · 2025 1 ·
Analysis
51reviewed cases analysed
113rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
4cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- In re Esteban R.S. CA4/1
- In re Ezekiel D. CA4/1
- In re Chelsea L. CA4/1
- In re L.L. CA4/1
- In re E.P. CA4/1
- In re S.A. CA4/1
- In re A.T. CA4/1
- In re J.M. CA4/1
- In re J.M. CA4/1
- In re L.R. CA4/1
- In re J.M. CA4/1
- In re A.P. CA4/1
- In re J.R. CA4/1
- In re J.K. CA4/1
- In re I.T. CA4/1
- In re K.F. CA4/1
- In re V.A. CA4/1
- In re E.M. CA4/1
- In re S.P. CA4/1
- In re J.W. CA4/1
- In re R.S. CA4/1
- In re A.H. CA4/1
- In re H.R. CA4/1
- In re Y.M.
- In re L.D. CA4/1