gno.law
Marilyn L. Huff
Work of Federal Government · source

Marilyn L. Huff

District judge · Superior Court of Southern District of California County · 1993–2026

Judge, District Court, S.D. California 1991–

B--
99% — 280.5 of 282 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 38% of 51 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

125cases reviewed on appeal
309opinions authored
332panels sat on (not as author)
24%reversed, in whole or part, of 107 merits decisions

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 81 reversed 14 reversed in part 7 vacated 5 dismissed 4 remanded 2

The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets

affirmed 6 reversed 1 dismissed 1

Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.

Areas

civil 70 criminal 50 other 4 delinquency 1

By year: 1997 17 · 2018 11 · 2019 9 · 1998 9 · 2010 8 · 2011 7 · 2020 6 · 2017 6 · 2007 6 · 2024 5 · 2021 5 · 1999 5 · 2026 4 · 2025 3 · 2008 3 · 2022 2 · 2016 2 · 2012 2 · 2009 2 · 2005 2 · 1996 2 · 1993 2 · 2015 1 · 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 2006 1 · 2003 1 · 2002 1 · 2000 1 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases authored (every role)

  1. Berland v. The Conclave, LLC 3:20-cv-00922 · 2021-08-25 · civil
  2. Pulte Home Corporation v. American Safety Indemnity Company 3:16-cv-02567 · 2021-08-23 · civil
  3. Tate v. Owens 3:20-cv-00199 · 2021-08-05 · civil
  4. Kendall v. Odonate Therapeutics, Inc. 3:20-cv-01828 · 2021-08-04 · civil
  5. Doe v. Law Offices of Winn 3:06-cv-00599 · 2021-06-29 · civil
  6. Ensource Investments LLC v. Willis 3:17-cv-00079 · 2021-06-21 · civil
  7. Doe v. Law Offices of Winn 3:06-cv-00599 · 2021-06-21 · civil
  8. Fraher v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC 3:21-cv-00763 · 2021-06-21 · civil
  9. Tan v. Quick Box, LLC 3:20-cv-01082 · 2021-06-16 · civil
  10. Johnson v. Altamirano 3:19-cv-01185 · 2021-06-08 · civil
  11. Berland v. The Conclave, LLC 3:20-cv-00922 · 2021-06-04 · civil
  12. Cstechus, Inc. v. NorthernZone, LLC 3:21-cv-00122 · 2021-05-28 · civil
  13. Horton v. County of San Diego 3:21-cv-00400 · 2021-05-27 · civil
  14. Mollison v. LVNV Funding, LLC 3:18-cv-01023 · 2021-05-20 · civil
  15. Scripps Health v. nThrive Revenue Systems, LLC 3:19-cv-00760 · 2021-05-18 · civil
  16. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sztrom 3:21-cv-00086 · 2021-05-11 · civil
  17. Allele Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc. 3:20-cv-01958 · 2021-05-04 · civil
  18. Pettersen v. Circle K Stores Inc. 3:21-cv-00237 · 2021-05-04 · civil
  19. S.W. v. Lincoln Military Property Management Inc. 3:21-cv-00493 · 2021-04-22 · civil
  20. Sihler v. The Fulfillment Lab, Inc 3:20-cv-01528 · 2021-04-07 · civil
  21. Ward v. COMMSCOPE, Inc. 3:21-cv-00370 · 2021-04-06 · civil
  22. Islands Restaurants, LP v. Affiliated FM Insurance Company 3:20-cv-02013 · 2021-04-02 · civil
  23. Young v. County of San Diego 3:20-cv-02441 · 2021-03-22 · civil
  24. Seybert v. CHLN, Inc. 3:20-cv-02529 · 2021-03-11 · civil
  25. Vaughn v. Hampton 3:19-cv-01687 · 2021-03-09 · civil