Linda Lopez
, District Court, S.D. California 2018–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 12 vacated 3 reversed 3 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 5 · 2026 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Tan v. Quick Box, LLC
- "Lily" v. Little
- Shallowhorn v. Carrillo
- Akbar v. Blinken
- Navarrette v. Department of Homeland Security
- Tibrio, LLC v. Flex Marketing, LLC
- Baron v. Staff Benefits Management Inc.
- Parker v. Pollard
- Eric Bidwell v. County of San Diego
- Sihler v. The Fulfillment Lab, Inc
- Merhi v. Lowes Home Center, LLC
- Grimes v. S&R Towing
- Merhi v. Lowes Home Center, LLC
- Merhi v. Lowes Home Center, LLC
- Catalyst Lifestyle Limited v. Elago Co., Ltd
- Davis v. Winnick
- Castillo v. Bureau of Prisons
- Hammett v. Sherman
- Cairns v. Quinn
- Harris v. City of San Diego, San Diego Police Department
- Buckelew v. Gore
- Cartwright v. San Diego Sheriff's Department
- United States v. LeBeau
- Pacific Vibrations, LLC v. Slow Gold Limited
- Hi, Inc. v. Zeetogroup, LLC