Leo Valentine, Jr.
B
72% — 29 of 40 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 32% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
31cases reviewed on appeal
35%reversed, in whole or part, of 31 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 19 reversed in part 10 reversed 1 modified 1
Areas
criminal 27 civil 2 other 1 delinquency 1
By year: 2014 9 · 2013 6 · 2015 5 · 2016 4 · 2023 3 · 2020 2 · 2018 2 ·
Analysis
50reviewed cases analysed
178rulings read
2rulings where the model disagrees with the court
9cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- People v. Ware CA4/1
- People v. Ware CA4/1
- People v. Ware CA4/1
- People v. Ware
- People v. Ware
- People v. Bail Hotline Bail Bonds, Inc.
- People v. Stutelberg
- In re Kane W. CA4/1
- People v. McKinney CA4/1
- People v. Tang CA4/1
- People v. Shaw CA4/1
- People v. Inga CA4/1
- People v. Mundy CA4/1
- People v. Cortez CA4/1
- People v. McKinney CA4/1
- People v. Johnson CA4/1
- People v. Joiner CA4/1
- People v. Valadez CA4/1
- People v. Inga CA4/1
- Farah v. Mohamud CA4/1
- People v. Hood
- People v. Jimenez CA4/1
- People v. Vo Nghia Sy
- People v. Ismail CA4/1
- People v. Bradley CA4/1