Kunzel
F+
96% — 25.0 of 26 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 86% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Carlsbad Union Sch. Dist. of San Diego County v. Rafferty
- Gist v. United States
- Rosa v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
- Yee Chien Woo v. Rosenberg
- Pope v. United States
- Yourman v. United States
- Stork v. United States
- Baldauf v. Nitze
- United States v. County of San Diego
- Tampa Tugs and Towing, Inc. v. M/V SANDANGER
- Lettice v. United States
- Armstrong v. United States
- First National Trust & Savings Bank of San Diego v. United States
- Limoneira Co. v. Wirtz
- W. H. Wickersham & Co. v. S.S. Nictric
- Griswold v. United States
- Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
- Goldberg v. Eagle Maintenance & Supply Co.
- United States v. Olesen
- Fematt v. City of Los Angeles, Cal.
- Erie Resistor Corp. v. Solar Manufacturing Corp.
- Cate Ditch Co. v. United States
- Fematt v. Nedlloyd Line
- Mitchell v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
- Hotel Sherman, Inc. v. Harlow