Kira L. Klatchko
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2017–
D
57% — 8 of 14 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 69% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
39cases reviewed on appeal
26%reversed, in whole or part, of 34 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 25 reversed 7 writ granted 2 reversed in part 2 dismissed 2 writ denied 1
Areas
By year: 2023 14 · 2025 6 · 2022 6 · 2026 4 · 2024 4 · 2021 4 · 2020 1 ·
Analysis
17reviewed cases analysed
46rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
3cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Gonzalez v. Bowens CA4/1
- County of Riverside v. Stanger CA4/1
- Daves v. City of Cathedral City CA4/1
- Waring Plaza Properties, L.People v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. CA4/2
- Brown v. Montage at Mission Hills, Inc.
- Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner
- Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner, LLC CA4/2