Kira L. Klatchko
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2017–
D
57% — 8 of 14 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 69% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
39cases reviewed on appeal
26%reversed, in whole or part, of 34 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 25 reversed 7 writ granted 2 reversed in part 2 dismissed 2 writ denied 1
Areas
By year: 2023 14 · 2025 6 · 2022 6 · 2026 4 · 2024 4 · 2021 4 · 2020 1 ·
Analysis
17reviewed cases analysed
46rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
3cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- State Compensation Ins. Fund v. ReadyLink Healthcare CA4/1
- Ace Design & Construction v. MAA Palm Desert Hospitality CA4/1
- City of Desert Hot Springs v. CA CFK CA4/2
- LaPay v. The Fairways Homeowner's Association CA4/2
- P.A. v. Plaza Towing CA4/3
- P.A. v. Plaza Towing CA4/3
- CFP BDA, LLC v. Super. Ct.
- CFP BDA v. Superior Court CA4/2
- Dumas v. Escamilla CA4/2
- Optiflex Properties and Development v. Duh CA4/1
- Gonzalez v. Bowens CA4/1
- Ross v. County of Riverside CA4/1
- County of Riverside v. Stanger CA4/1
- Shack v. NBC Universal CA4/2
- Daves v. City of Cathedral City CA4/1
- Beltran v. Hard Rock Hotel Licensing, Inc.
- Shontz v. Reid & Hellyer CA4/2
- Koslow v. Data Ticket CA4/2
- Richardson Investments v. Hajj CA4/2
- WVJP 2017-2 v. Kohan CA4/2
- Desert Regional Medical Center v. Teamsters and Food Employers etc. CA4/2
- Barber v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA4/1
- Dawodu v. Meneses CA4/2
- Torres v. Dixon CA4/2
- Koslow v. Data Ticket, Inc. CA4/2