Kim Garlin Dunning
Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of Orange 2009–2010
F
provisional — 44% — 4 of 9 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 89% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 9 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
44cases reviewed on appeal
31%reversed, in whole or part, of 36 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 25 reversed 7 writ granted 6 reversed in part 4 writ denied 1 other 1
Areas
By year: 2014 12 · 2015 8 · 2013 5 · 2019 4 · 2018 4 · 2017 4 · 2016 4 · 2022 1 · 2020 1 · 2003 1 ·
Analysis
7 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- Marentes v. Impac Funding Corp. CA4/2
- Guillory v. Hill
- Guillory v. Hill
- Hernandez v. Rancho Santiago Community College Dist.
- Kizer v. Tristar Risk Management
- Orange County Water Dist. v. MAG Aerospace Industries
- Marriage of Cuk CA4/3
- Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.
- Abedi v. Sheikhpour CA4/3
- Valdovinos v. American Logistics Co. CA4/3
- WA Southwest 2, LLC v. First American Title Insurance
- Kaghazchi v. Mercedes-Benz Financial CA4/3
- Golba v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
- City of Irvine v. County of Orange
- Yu v. Interstate Fire and Casualty Co. CA4/3
- Yu v. American Safety Indemnity CA4/3
- Yu v. Landmark American Ins. Co. CA4/3
- Lookout Point Alliance v. City of Newport Beach CA4/3
- Sema Construction v. City of Tustin CA4/3
- Yu v. Century Surety CA4/3
- Castleview Home Loans v. Home Loan Center CA4/3
- Orange County Water Dist. v. Telex Communications Holdings CA4/3
- Thompson v. Automobile Club etc.
- Burns v. WD-40 Co. CA4/3
- Heyman v. Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Corp.