Joseph T. Ortiz
D++
provisional — 60% — 3 of 5 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 62% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
11cases reviewed on appeal
—8 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 5 writ granted 3 reversed 2 reversed in part 1
Areas
By year: 2025 6 · 2024 3 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
4 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- Montelongo v. Simpson Sandblasting and Special Coating CA4/1
- Qi v. Superior Court CA4/2
- Rancho Cucamonga Central School Dist. v. Super. Ct.
- Rancho Cucamonga Central School District v. Superior Court CA4/2
- Cobos v. Nat. Gen. Insurance Co.
- Cobos v. National General Insurance Company CA4/3
- Rogers v. City of Redlands
- Rogers v. City of Redlands CA4/3
- Incentax v. Gan CA4/3
- Hitt v. Hitt CA4/1
- Wendy M. v. Abernathy CA4/2