John D. Molloy
C++
67% — 33 of 49 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 42% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
459cases reviewed on appeal
35%reversed, in whole or part, of 418 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 265 reversed 132 dismissed 34 reversed in part 11 modified 8 writ granted 4 writ denied 2 vacated 2 remanded 1
Areas
By year: 2025 100 · 2022 80 · 2021 75 · 2023 67 · 2024 63 · 2020 47 · 2026 11 · 2013 7 · 2016 3 · 2014 3 · 2019 1 · 2018 1 · 2017 1 ·
Analysis
76reviewed cases analysed
153rulings read
2rulings where the model disagrees with the court
18cases with a verified missed authority
1appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases reviewed on appeal (every role)
- People v. Robinson CA4/2
- People v. Kieta CA4/2
- People v. Wahlert CA4/2
- People v. Olvera CA4/2
- People v. Doster CA4/2
- People v. Luft CA4/2
- Price v. Superior Court
- People v. Brown CA4/2
- People v. Araoz CA4/2
- People v. Green CA4/1
- People v. Shelton CA4/2
- People v. Flores CA4/2
- People v. Jenkins CA4/2
- People v. Werntz
- People v. Rodriguez CA4/1
- People v. Guevara CA4/2
- People v. Wynn CA4/1
- People v. Carr
- People v. Thompson CA4/2
- People v. Lopez
- People v. Bullette CA4/2
- People v. Diaz CA4/2
- People v. Sawyer CA4/2
- People v. Zuniga CA4/2
- People v. Mello CA4/2