John D. Molloy
C++
67% — 33 of 49 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 42% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
459cases reviewed on appeal
35%reversed, in whole or part, of 418 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 265 reversed 132 dismissed 34 reversed in part 11 modified 8 writ granted 4 writ denied 2 vacated 2 remanded 1
Areas
By year: 2025 100 · 2022 80 · 2021 75 · 2023 67 · 2024 63 · 2020 47 · 2026 11 · 2013 7 · 2016 3 · 2014 3 · 2019 1 · 2018 1 · 2017 1 ·
Analysis
76reviewed cases analysed
153rulings read
2rulings where the model disagrees with the court
18cases with a verified missed authority
1appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases reviewed on appeal (every role)
- People v. Martinez CA4/2
- People v. White CA4/2
- People v. Fernandez CA4/2
- People v. Pizano CA4/2
- People v. Rodriguez CA4/2
- People v. Castro CA4/2
- People v. Gomez CA4/2
- People v. Guerrero CA4/2
- People v. Rodola CA4/2
- People v. Tranum CA4/2
- People v. Aguirre CA4/2
- People v. Montana CA4/2
- People v. Riels CA4/2
- People v. Peace CA4/2
- People v. Moreno CA4/1
- People v. Lacy CA4/2
- People v. Perez CA4/2
- People v. Cline CA4/2
- People v. Garcia CA4/2
- People v. Jacuinde CA4/2
- People v. Bowman CA4/2
- People v. Espinoza CA4/2
- People v. Yost CA4/2
- People v. Varney CA4/2
- People v. Valenzuela CA4/2