Joel R. Wohlfeil
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2007–
C+
66% — 160 of 241 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
145cases reviewed on appeal
29%reversed, in whole or part, of 126 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 88 reversed 21 reversed in part 15 writ granted 9 writ denied 8 modified 2 dismissed 2
Areas
By year: 2021 20 · 2015 17 · 2023 13 · 2014 13 · 2026 12 · 2022 12 · 2024 11 · 2016 11 · 2020 10 · 2025 8 · 2013 7 · 2017 6 · 2018 3 · 2019 2 ·
Analysis
258reviewed cases analysed
816rulings read
3rulings where the model disagrees with the court
36cases with a verified missed authority
1appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases reviewed on appeal (every role)
- Lucore v. U.S. Bank CA4/1
- Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Alkasabi v. Chandler Heights AZ CA4/1
- Harvey v. Ridgecrest Community, LLC CA4/1
- Olive Lane Industrial Park, LLC v. County of San Diego
- Mortazavi v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- Lifeline Funding v. Johnston CA4/1
- Square One, Inc. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- Wai Feng Trading Co. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- Boulder Skies Ltd. Partnership v. Prazma CA4/1
- Al-Awadi v. Housing Authority for the County of San Diego CA4/1
- Ferrell v. County of San Diego CA4/1
- Fulton v. State of California, Dept. of Transportation CA4/1
- Briercrest Development v. City of La Mesa CA4/1
- Geiserman v. Tudor CA4/1
- Pena v. PNC Bank CA4/1
- Young v. Mountain Empire Unified School Dist. CA4/1
- Marriage of Farida CA4/1
- Cauzza v. Julian Union H.S. Dist. CA4/1
- E.T. v. C.T. CA4/1