Joan M. Lewis
A--
78% — 131 of 167 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 19% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
75cases reviewed on appeal
33%reversed, in whole or part, of 73 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 49 reversed 16 reversed in part 8 writ granted 1 writ denied 1
Areas
By year: 2016 17 · 2014 16 · 2013 16 · 2015 12 · 2018 6 · 2017 3 · 2007 2 · 2021 1 · 2019 1 · 2008 1 ·
Analysis
141reviewed cases analysed
531rulings read
4rulings where the model disagrees with the court
22cases with a verified missed authority
2appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Webb v. Hadzicki CA4/1
- Barron v. National Mentor Healthcare CA4/1
- Site Management Services v. Cingular Wireless CA4/1
- McCormick v. Foremost Ins. Co CA4/1
- Weseloh v. Samaniego CA4/1
- Mack v. Shannahan CA4/1
- American Express Travel v. Carmichael CA4/1
- Rum Hospitality Development v. Keating Hotel CA4/1
- Angelica Textile Services v. Park
- BCS Investments v. Lorenz CA4/1
- Angelica Textile Services v. Park
- Angelica Textile Services Inc. v. Park
- Hernandez v. Fusion Food & Boba Cafe CA4/1
- Sukumar v. Ballard CA4/1
- Dana Point v. Cal. Coastal Com.
- Montgomery v. Crumpler CA4/1
- Chau v. Chau CA4/1
- Ronay Family Limited Partnership v. Tweed
- Grantville Action Group v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- Kidane v. El Cajon Motors CA4/1
- McLay v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/1
- Yancey v. Antoniadis CA4/1
- Surrey v. TRUEBEGINNINGS, LLC
- SHARP HEALTHCARE v. County of San Diego
- Patel v. LIEBERMENSCH