James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- The Canadian Farmer
- Elliott & Horne v. Chambers Land Co.
- People v. Smith
- Crandall v. Shay
- Honey v. Honey
- Poindexter v. Los Angeles Stone Co.
- Morrow v. Morrow
- People v. Kady
- Swain v. Los Angeles Morris Plan Co.
- Wright v. Phillips
- Burd v. Downing
- People v. Estrada
- People v. Reynolds
- Phipps v. Western Pacific Development Co.
- Kohn v. National Film Corp. of America
- Estate of Knauft
- People v. Garcia
- People v. Sutherland
- Pallett v. Guenther
- Davis v. Fell
- People v. Hunter
- McCready v. Bullis
- People v. Lauman
- Birch v. County of Orange
- Rogers Lamb Co. v. Coast Securities Co.