James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Hamlin v. Barnhart
- Robinson v. Anderson
- Pac. Carbonator Co. v. Haydes & Son
- Burr v. MacLay Rancho Water Co.
- County of Los Angeles v. Hammel
- Smith v. Indus. Accident Comm'n of Cal.
- Yount v. Arakalian Bros. Co.
- Benedict v. Greer-Robbins. Co.
- Goldsmith v. Goldsmith
- Lewis v. Lapique
- Weinstock-Nichols Co. v. Courtney
- People v. Dyer
- Henderson v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
- People v. Youtz
- People v. Imamura
- De Galler v. Maier Brewing Co.
- People v. Valenzuela
- Baker v. Eilers Music Company
- People v. Peery
- People v. Ronsse
- Herington v. Alta Planing Mill Co.
- Puterbaugh v. McCray
- Midway Five Oil Co. v. Citizens National Bank
- People v. Isenberg
- McNutt v. Pabst