James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Lynch v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.
- City of Los Angeles v. Moore
- City of Los Angeles v. Moore
- People v. Bradfield
- Whitcomb v. Worthing
- Porter v. Superior Court
- Gaskill v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
- Morris v. Winans
- Koch v. Wilcoxon
- People v. Deatrick
- People v. Wilkison
- Harpold v. Slocum
- People v. Cavanaugh
- People v. McLeod
- Mortell v. Los Angeles College of Osteopathy
- In Re Willis
- Rigdon v. Common Council
- Gordon v. Roberts
- People v. Phillips
- Wilson v. Shea
- Dox v. R. E. Lomax Co.
- McCarty v. Superior Court
- Hopkins v. Sanderson
- Hester v. McMullan
- Matter of Application of Howell