James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Legerton v. Chambers
- In Re Saul
- City of San Diego v. Capps
- Leutheuser v. Silent
- Callahan v. Danziger
- Lichtenthaler v. Samson Iron Works
- Bauman v. Wuest
- Burns v. Hammel
- Silver Lake Power & Irrigation Co. v. City of Los Angeles
- In re Waite
- People v. Fages
- In Re Waite
- Deeble v. Exchange National Bank
- People v. Wing
- People v. Andrade
- Dahne v. Superior Court
- Dellaringa v. Hooker
- Catlin v. Union Oil Co.
- Copp v. Guaranty Oil Co.
- Youtz v. Farmers & Merchants' Natl. Bank
- Brode v. Clark
- People v. Visconti
- Hopkins v. Sanderson
- Cox v. Jerome
- Peters v. Superior Court