James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Young v. Estate of Canfield
- People v. Kuhn
- Compton Land Co. v. Vaughan
- Rodgers v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.
- Clark v. Berlin Realty Co.
- People v. Gilbreth
- Van Calbergh v. Easton
- Abalas v. Consolidated Construction Co.
- Sherriff v. Sherriff
- Kling v. Bucher
- McCaleb v. McCaleb
- In re Messenheimer
- In Re Wisner
- In Re Messenheimer
- People v. Herrera
- Legerton v. Lewis
- Legerton v. Chambers
- In Re Saul
- City of San Diego v. Capps
- Leutheuser v. Silent
- Callahan v. Danziger
- Ott Hardware Co. v. Holmberg
- Lichtenthaler v. Samson Iron Works
- Bauman v. Wuest
- Burns v. Hammel