In re Messenheimer
In the Matter of the Application of HUBERT MESSENHEIMER for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
- Panel
- James (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — James
JAMES, J.
In this matter petitioner was charged under the same ordinance and in like form as was the petitioner Wisner in the habeas corpus matter decided this day (Crim. No. 528), ante, p. 637, the only difference being that the petitioner here was charged with having played upon a different musical instrument from that used by said Wisner. What is said in the opinion in the matter of Wisner is applicable here. Upon the authority of that decision, it is ordered that petitioner be discharged from custody.
Conrey, P. J., concurred.
Shaw, J., concurred in the judgment.