James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- MacKenzie v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n
- Hebert v. Byron Jackson Iron Works
- Shuler v. Corl
- Storrow v. Green
- In Re Hittson
- People v. Elgar
- Sherwood v. Wood
- MacCoy v. Gage
- Horton v. Moore
- O'Brien v. New Method Co-Operative Laundry Co.
- Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi
- Kengel v. Stuart
- People v. Bailey
- Globe Grain & Milling Co. v. Walker Construction Co.
- Smith v. F. L. Moore Motor Truck Co.
- Santa Fe Land Improvement Co. v. City of San Diego
- Sander v. Los Angeles Ry. Corporation
- Lowry v. County of Los Angeles
- State Bank of Ramona v. Clelland
- Gish v. Huckaby
- Engebritsen v. Latin-American Publishing Co.
- People v. Emrick
- People v. Delgado
- Ferguson v. Marsh