James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Huntoon
- People v. Huntoon
- People v. Khan
- People v. Loza
- Marr v. City of Glendale
- Haun v. Tally
- Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los Angeles
- Thomas v. Newmark Grain Co.
- Grbavach v. Casualty Co. of America
- O'Neil v. Brode
- Jensen v. Allen
- People v. Richaud
- Klokke Investment Co. v. Superior Court
- McGillivray v. Hampton
- Home Real Estate Co. v. Winnants
- Siple v. Knapp
- Crown Laundry & Cleaning Co. v. Cameron
- Taggart v. Graham
- People v. Seeley
- Blythe v. Lamberth
- Ransch v. Arp.
- Blythe v. Lamberth
- People v. Redman
- Victoria Park Co. v. Continental Insurance
- Carlton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.