James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Himovitz v. Silverman
- Smith v. Peters
- Chambers v. Security Commercial & Savings Bank
- E. Bastheim Co. v. Schultz
- Harpold v. Slocum
- Los Angeles Humane Society v. Adler
- City of Los Angeles v. McKeag
- Southern California Oil Syndicate of London, England v. Lompoc Produce & Real Estate Co.
- Zimmerman v. Prior
- Mitchell v. Mitchell
- Los Angeles Furniture Co. v. Hansen
- Ziegler v. Colkins
- Ziegler v. Colkins
- People v. Morales
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Avery v. Hagenios
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. Simons Brick Co.
- Tryon v. Clinch
- Fawcett v. Edmund Peycke Co.
- Pioneer Truck Co. v. Clark
- Ward v. Andrews
- Ward v. Gildea
- I. W. Williams Co. v. Ah Quin
- Knapp v. Lyman
- People v. Rosenkrantz