James M. Seawell
59cases reviewed on appeal
31%reversed, in whole or part, of 32 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
other 26 affirmed 22 reversed 9 vacated 1 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 1918 6 · 1917 6 · 1915 5 · 1912 5 · 1916 4 · 1920 3 · 1911 3 · 1910 3 · 1905 3 · 1900 3 · 1919 2 · 1914 2 · 1913 2 · 1908 2 · 1904 2 · 1901 2 · 1922 1 · 1909 1 · 1907 1 · 1906 1 · 1902 1 · 1899 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Needham v. Sisters of Mercy
- Harper v. Murray
- Pacific Mut. L. Ins Co. v. Pacific Surety Co.
- Larsen v. City & County of San Francisco
- Spotton v. Dyer
- Aalwyn's Law Institute v. City of San Francisco
- Farquharson v. Scoble
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co.
- Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.
- California Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Union Tr. Co. of S.F.
- New England Equitable Insurance v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Roberts
- Bienfield v. Van Ness
- Ransome Construction Co. v. Von Schroeder
- Wildenhayn v. Justice's Court
- MacDermot v. Hayes
- Dowling v. Spring Valley Water Co.
- Hayne v. City & County of San Francisco
- Scholle v. Finnell
- U'ren v. State Board of Control
- Fox v. Windemere Hotel Apartment Co.
- Ginty v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.
- Symmes v. Sierra Nevada Mining Co.
- Jasper v. Presley
- Simen v. Sam Aftergut Co.