Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co.
Cudahy Packing Company v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co.
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- James M. Seawell
- Outcome
- reversed — the judgment is reversed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Frank H. Kerrigan (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The questions involved in this appeal are in all respects similar to those presented in Armour Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co. (No. 2104), ante, p. 773, [173 P. 404], and upon the authority of that case the judgment is reversed.
Zook, J., pro tem., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 13, 1918, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 10, 1918.
Cites, in this corpus
- Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co. Civ. No. 2104. · 1918-04-13