J. David Mazurek
F--
30% — 3 of 10 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 97% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
47cases reviewed on appeal
33%reversed, in whole or part, of 43 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 24 reversed in part 8 reversed 6 modified 5 dismissed 3 writ denied 1
Areas
By year: 2021 8 · 2013 8 · 2014 6 · 2024 5 · 2023 4 · 2020 4 · 2022 3 · 2016 3 · 2025 2 · 2015 2 · 2026 1 · 2018 1 ·
Analysis
20reviewed cases analysed
72rulings read
2rulings where the model disagrees with the court
5cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- People v. Ramos CA4/1
- People v. Williams CA4/2
- People v. Aguayo CA4/2
- People v. Guerra CA4/2
- People v. Rounds
- People v. Campos CA4/1
- People v. Shephard CA4/2
- People v. Smith CA4/1
- People v. Wilkins CA4/1
- Valdez v. Superior Court CA4/2
- People v. Langston CA4/2
- People v. Lewis
- People v. Gonzales CA4/2
- People v. Simon CA4/2
- People v. Awardo CA4/2
- People v. Stewart CA4/2
- People v. Awardo CA4/2
- People v. Westfall CA4/2
- People v. Sunny CA4/2
- People v. Sunny CA4/2
- People v. Wilkins
- People v. Shephard CA4/2
- People v. Serrano CA4/2
- People v. Welch CA4/2
- People v. Buford CA4/2