Irma Poole Asberry
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2007–
F++
50% — 5 of 10 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 83% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
56cases reviewed on appeal
18%reversed, in whole or part, of 49 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 37 reversed 8 writ granted 4 modified 3 dismissed 2 writ denied 1 reversed in part 1
Areas
civil 34 criminal 21 probate 1
By year: 2025 8 · 2024 8 · 2015 8 · 2023 7 · 2021 7 · 2022 4 · 2016 4 · 2014 4 · 2020 3 · 2017 2 · 2026 1 ·
Analysis
12reviewed cases analysed
36rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
1cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- People v. Orozco CA4/2
- Graham v. Moore CA4/3
- Drost v. Sheridan CA4/1
- Sylvia v. Toth CA4/3
- People v. Wang CA4/3
- McCurdy v. County of Riverside
- Tanguay v. Lavallee CA4/3
- The Price Reit v. Poke-Ria CA4/3
- Martinson v. Banning Unified School District CA4/2
- Saba v. Princess Cruise Lines CA4/2
- Ameritemps of PA v. U.S. Continental Marketing CA4/1
- Sgarlato v. County of Riverside CA4/2
- HayDx v. Ichida CA4/2
- Said v. Costco Wholesale CA4/2
- Los Portales Association v. Fitness International CA4/2
- Shouse v. County of Riverside
- Peters v. City of Beaumont CA4/2
- Kim v. Vivas CA4/1
- Kim v. Vivas CA4/1
- Service Employees Internat. Union v. Woods CA4/2
- Jackson v. Truong CA4/2
- Sujan v. Corona Regional Medical Center CA4/2
- Allen v. MacIntosh CA4/2
- Wilson v. Gonzalez CA4/2
- Ahn v. Hestrin CA4/2