Huff
A-
100% — 61.0 of 61 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Estate of Adkins , by and through Adkins v. County of San Diego
- Wi-Lan Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc.
- Pulte Home Corp. v. TIG Ins. Co.
- Pulte Home Corp. v. American Safety Indemnity Co.
- Pulte Home Corp. v. American Safety Indemnity Co.
- Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Allmax Nutrition, Inc.
- Feist v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.
- Kanfer v. Pharmacare US, Inc.
- Kauffman v. CallFire, Inc.
- Sandoval v. PharmaCare US, Inc.
- Boon v. Professional Collection Consultants
- Astiana v. Kashi Co.
- Halliwell v. A-T Solutions
- Boon v. Professional Collection Consultants
- Boon v. Professional Collection Consultants
- Astiana v. Kashi Co.
- Oliver v. IN-N-Out Burgers
- Cox v. Clarus Marketing Group, LLC
- Oliver v. In-N-Out Burgers
- Beck-Ellman v. Kaz USA, Inc.
- Glover v. Borelli's Pizza, Inc.
- Stein v. Dowling
- Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. v. Gordini U.S.A. Inc.
- In re Ferrero Litigation
- Donald Morinskey v. Css