gno.law

Huff

Justice, Court of Appeal · 1991–2019

A-
100% — 61.0 of 61 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

63opinions authored
86panels sat on (not as author)

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases

  1. Superior Services, Inc. v. Dalton 94-494 H · 1994-04-21 · civil
  2. Castro v. Allstate Insurance CV 93-1538 H (CM) · 1994-03-22 · civil
  3. Saad v. Dalton CV 93-1472 H(POR) · 1994-03-01 · civil
  4. McLamb v. United States Department of Treasury CV 93-1695 H (POR) · 1994-02-24 · civil
  5. Riess v. Dalton CV 91-853 H (CM) · 1993-12-17 · criminal
  6. Gen-Probe Inc. v. Center for Neurologic Study CV 93-1284 H (BTM) · 1993-11-12 · civil
  7. Bridge Publications, Inc. v. Vien CV 92-1539 H(M) · 1993-05-04 · civil
  8. Lauger ex rel. Lauger v. Shalala No. CV 92-1443 H(LSP) · 1993-03-18 · civil
  9. United States v. Meraz-Solomon Crim. No. 92-909 H · 1992-09-11 · civil
  10. Sycuan Band of Mission Indians v. Roache 91-1648 H (BTM), 91-1669 H (BTM) · 1992-02-24 · civil
  11. Kreisner v. City of San Diego, Cal. 90-55354 · 1991-12-13 · civil