Hayes
B
99% — 64.5 of 65 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 31% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Higginson v. Becerra
- United States v. Carey
- Brinkley ex rel. Herself v. Monterey Fin. Servs., LLC
- Nino v. United States
- City of San Diego v. Monsanto Co.
- City of San Diego v. Monsanto Co.
- City of Vista v. Gen. Reinsurance Corp.
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Monsanto Co.
- Midbrook Flowerbulbs Holland B v. v. Holland America Bulb Farms, Inc.
- Perez v. Diaz
- Robert Mahoney v. City of Seattle
- Catherine Low v. Patrick Donahoe
- C. R. v. Seattle Public Schools
- Tricia Melland v. Cornerstone Dental, Pc
- United States v. Leroy Charles
- Becerra v. General Motors LLC
- United States v. Cy Brown
- Bahr v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Trade Commission v. AT & T Mobility LLC
- Veasley ex rel. Veasley v. United States
- United States v. Brenden Vermilyea
- Javier Serrano-Ceballos v. Loretta E. Lynch
- Rodney Emil v. Renee Baker
- Solo ex rel. Solo v. American Ass'n of University Women
- Mack v. Colvin