Hall
F
95% — 123.0 of 129 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 91% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1962 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Tracy v. California Electrical Works
- Tracy v. California Electrical Works
- Wood, Curtis & Co. v. Seurich
- Marshutz v. Seltzor
- Spencer v. San Francisco Brick Co.
- Hubbard v. Justice's Court
- Kilillea v. Wilson
- Elliott v. Clark
- Maxwell v. Fresno City Railway Co.
- Union Savings Bank v. Willard
- Higuera v. Del Ponte
- Austin v. Union Paving and Contracting Co.
- Johnson v. Center
- Fisher v. Bartholomew
- Hatton v. Gregg
- Johnston v. Mulcahy
- Hatton v. Gregg
- Barling v. Weeks
- Vasey v. Campbell
- Anderson v. Bank of Santa Cruz County
- Rodrigue v. Rogers
- Craig v. Dowie
- People v. Thornburgh
- Copriviza v. Rilovich
- People v. Druffel