Gray
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Areas
By year: 1990 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Gehrig
- People v. Gehrig
- Merguire v. O'Donnell
- Kirby v. Potter
- Sears v. Ackerman
- De Haven v. McAuley
- Hogan v. Globe Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n
- People v. Cadot
- Sheehan v. Osborn
- People v. Jackson
- Foster v. Bowles
- Napa State Hospital v. County of Yuba
- Foster v. Bowles
- Mathew v. Mathew
- Minaker v. California Canneries Co.
- Aldrich v. Barton
- Hilmer v. Hills
- Gabriel v. Tonner
- Strong v. Los Nietos & Ranchito Walnut Growers' Ass'n
- Buckman v. Hatch
- Dowdell v. Carpy
- Latimer v. Capay Valley Land Co.
- Converse v. Scott
- Cooper v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway
- Temescal Oil Mining & Development Co. v. Salcido