Gray
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Areas
By year: 1990 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.
- Minehan v. Silveria
- Marshall v. Smith
- City of Los Angeles v. Duncan
- Garrison v. Blanchard
- Rosenberg v. Bullard
- White v. Lantz
- Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Arrowhead Springs Beverage Co.
- General Paint Corp. v. Seymour
- Lloyd v. City of Redondo Beach
- Strange v. Los Angeles Examiner
- Roberts Land & Improvement Co. v. Dallas
- Bert E. Anderson Co. v. Hasha
- John A. Vaughan Corp. v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.
- Moskovitz v. Lefrancois
- Anglo California Trust Co. v. Kelley
- Bezera v. Associated Oil Co.
- Tieman v. Red Top Cab Co.
- Hyde v. City of Santa Cruz
- People v. Fisher
- Sutton v. Tanger
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Grangers' Business Ass'n
- Stern v. Hillman
- Toms v. Hellman
- Delpit v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.