Froehlich
B--
99% — 141.5 of 143 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 37% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Goldberg v. Frye
- In Re Marriage of Kirk
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior Court
- People v. Santellanes
- B.C.E. Development, Inc. v. Smith
- Koll Hancock Torrey Pines v. Biophysica Foundation, Inc.
- San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Kelly D.
- People v. Domagalski
- Freedman v. Superior Court
- Dumas v. Stocker
- Zephyr Park, Ltd. v. Superior Court
- Bianchi v. City of San Diego
- Guedalia v. Superior Court
- Salem v. Superior Court
- Higgins v. Maher
- City of Santee v. County of San Diego
- People v. Anderson
- San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Lee P.
- Coe v. Farmers New World Life Insurance
- People v. McElroy
- Bryte v. City of La Mesa
- People v. Truett
- Livett v. F. C. Financial Associates, Ltd.
- Electric Supplies Distributing Co. v. Imperial Hot Mineral Spa