Edward D. Webster
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 1986–2010 · , Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 1985–1986
A
provisional — 83% — 5 of 6 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 6 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
49cases reviewed on appeal
24%reversed, in whole or part, of 42 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 28 reversed 6 reversed in part 4 modified 4 writ denied 3 writ granted 2 other 2
Areas
By year: 2015 16 · 2016 14 · 2014 6 · 2013 6 · 1993 2 · 1990 2 · 1997 1 · 1994 1 · 1991 1 ·
Analysis
10reviewed cases analysed
39rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
1cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Salinas v. Bank of New York Mellon CA4/2
- People v. Adelmann
- People v. McDowell CA4/2
- Riverside County Transp. Comm. v. Holgate CA4/2
- People v. Castenada CA4/2
- Romero-Gold v. County of San Bernadino CA4/2
- Romero-Gold v. County of San Bernadino CA4/2
- City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Dept. v. American Alternative Ins. Corp. CA4/1
- People v. Aviles CA4/2
- People v. De La Rosa CA4/1
- Flannigan v. Onuldo, Inc. CA4/1
- People v. Grim CA4/1
- People v. Whitehorn CA4/2
- People v. Aikens CA4/2
- People v. Duncantell CA4/2
- People v. Whitehorn CA4/2
- People v. Butterfield CA4/2
- People v. Love CA4/2
- People v. Ryles CA4/2
- P. v. Simons CA4/2
- P. v. Rivera CA4/2
- P. v. Cardoso CA4/2
- P. v. Tuck CA4/2
- People v. Laster
- People v. Juarez