Earl H. Maas, III
B--
69% — 119 of 172 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 40% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
89cases reviewed on appeal
32%reversed, in whole or part, of 87 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 58 reversed 17 reversed in part 11 writ denied 2 modified 1
Areas
By year: 2015 17 · 2014 15 · 2016 12 · 2013 8 · 2024 7 · 2025 6 · 2021 6 · 2026 4 · 2023 3 · 2022 3 · 2017 3 · 2020 2 · 2019 2 · 2018 1 ·
Analysis
167reviewed cases analysed
566rulings read
2rulings where the model disagrees with the court
20cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases reviewed on appeal (every role)
- P.O.P. Enterprises v. Lively CA4/1
- Vanderpol v. Starr CA4/1
- P.O.P. Enterprises v. Lively CA4/1
- Purcell v. Schweitzer
- Purcell v. Schweitzer CA4/1
- Yeomans v. High Country Villas Management Corp. CA4/1
- Hauser v. Nelson CA4/1
- Kirk v. Dimitri CA4/1
- Hackbart v. Uppal CA4/1
- W2007 La Costa Resort v. Sephora USA CA4/1
- Whispering Palms Community Council v. County of San Diego CA4/1
- Torbett v. Pinkerton CA4/1
- Margolin v. Vital Pharmaceuticals CA4/1
- Sukumar v. Air Machine Com SRL