Maurice T. Dooling, Jr.
Judge, California Court of Appeal 1945–1960
A-
provisional — 100% — 4.0 of 4 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 4 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Newbauer v. Newbauer
- Boutwell v. State Board of Equalization
- Kleinclaus v. Marin Realty Co.
- Svistunoff v. Svistunoff
- Bradley v. Bradley
- Pacific Odorite Corp. v. Gersh
- Bille v. Manning
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Sparling
- Lamont v. Ball
- Fabbro v. Dardi & Co.
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Casey v. Bonelli
- Reuling v. Sergeant
- Ybarra v. Spangard
- Stucker v. Katz
- Robart v. Brehmer
- Huggans v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Felt v. L. B. Frederick Co.
- Scott v. City & County of San Francisco
- Roberts v. U. S. O. Camp Shows, Inc.
- Yuan v. Ping
- Kroupa v. Kroupa
- Farvour v. Geltis
- Turner v. Simpson