David M. Chapman
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2013–
A
85% — 11 of 13 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 10% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
41cases reviewed on appeal
42%reversed, in whole or part, of 38 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 22 reversed 16 dismissed 2 other 1
Areas
By year: 2022 7 · 2016 7 · 2015 7 · 2023 6 · 2021 6 · 2020 3 · 2019 3 · 2017 1 · 2014 1 ·
Analysis
12reviewed cases analysed
51rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
3cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- P. ex rel. etc. v. Hebb
- Regalado v. Callaghan
- Regalado v. Callaghan CA
- Pulte Homes Corp. v. Williams Mechanical, Inc.
- Castro v. IndyMac INDX Mortg. Loan Trust CA4/2
- Gilmore v. Commission on Professional Competence CA4/1
- Hale Industries v. Schlecht, Shevlin & Shoenberger CA4/2
- Bliss v. City of Indio CA4/2
- Palms & Sands Owners Assn. v. Bank of America CA4/1
- Palms & Sands Owners Assn. v. Bank of America CA4/1
- P. ex rel. Alzayat v. Hebb CA4/2
- Gehron v. Bank of America CA4/2
- Pasternack v. Fagel CA4/2
- Castro v. IndyMac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-AR21 CA4/2
- Darling v. Pentecost CA4/2
- Madison v. City of Cathedral City CA4/2