David M. Chapman
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2013–
A
85% — 11 of 13 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 10% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
41cases reviewed on appeal
42%reversed, in whole or part, of 38 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 22 reversed 16 dismissed 2 other 1
Areas
By year: 2022 7 · 2016 7 · 2015 7 · 2023 6 · 2021 6 · 2020 3 · 2019 3 · 2017 1 · 2014 1 ·
Analysis
12reviewed cases analysed
51rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
3cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Stuart v. Cannavino CA4/2
- Stuart v. Cannavino CA4/2
- Browne v. Hudson Insurance Co. CA4/2
- E-Commerce Lighting, Inc. v. E-Commerce Trade LLC
- Garcia v. City of Desert Hot Springs CA4/2
- Solomon v. Stiles CA4/2
- Sanchez v. JFK Memorial Hospital CA4/2
- Planet Bingo LLC v. The Burlington Ins. Co.
- Planet Bingo LLC v. The Burlington Ins. Co.
- State Comp. Ins. Fund v. ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc.
- Yang v. Tenet Healthcare Inc.
- City of Desert Hot Springs v. Valenti
- Cuevas-Martinez v. Sun Salt Sand, Inc.
- P. ex rel. etc. v. Hebb
- Pulte Homes Corp. v. Williams Mechanical, Inc.
- P. ex rel. Alzayat v. Hebb CA4/2