Daniel A. Ottolia
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2010–
D+
59% — 17 of 29 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 66% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
104cases reviewed on appeal
33%reversed, in whole or part, of 95 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 64 reversed 16 reversed in part 15 writ granted 6 dismissed 2 writ denied 1
Areas
By year: 2014 24 · 2024 10 · 2021 10 · 2026 9 · 2025 9 · 2015 9 · 2022 6 · 2016 6 · 2023 5 · 2018 5 · 2020 4 · 2019 3 · 2017 2 · 2013 2 ·
Analysis
36reviewed cases analysed
119rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
8cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Soto v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Guillen CA4/3
- Cham-Cal Engineering v. Cal. Regional Water Quality Control Bd. CA4/2
- Martinez v. CalCom Roofing CA4/1
- Gall v. Andrew's Sons CA4/1
- City of San Clemente v. Dept. of Transportation
- Riojas v. Marriott Resorts Hospitality Corp. CA4/1
- Bryant v. Dept. of Transportation CA4/2
- Bazan v. Curry CA4/2
- Patton v. County of Riverside CA4/2
- Spencer v. Superior Court CA4/2
- Janssen v. Oremor of Riverside CA4/2
- Nolan v. Ford Motor Company CA4/2
- Mayes v. La Sierra Univ.
- Frye v. The Legends Golf Club CA4/2
- Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency v. Springboard Solutions CA4/2
- Monster Energy Co. v. Holland CA4/2
- McAlister v. Harris CA4/2
- Townsend v. Olivo CA4/2
- Leon v. County of Riverside
- Leedy v. Bell CA4/2
- Arista v. County of Riverside CA4/2
- Colantuono v. Lake CA4/2
- Lee v. Newman CA4/2
- McAlister v. County of Riverside CA4/2