Daniel A. Ottolia
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2010–
D+
59% — 17 of 29 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 66% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
104cases reviewed on appeal
33%reversed, in whole or part, of 95 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 64 reversed 16 reversed in part 15 writ granted 6 dismissed 2 writ denied 1
Areas
By year: 2014 24 · 2024 10 · 2021 10 · 2026 9 · 2025 9 · 2015 9 · 2022 6 · 2016 6 · 2023 5 · 2018 5 · 2020 4 · 2019 3 · 2017 2 · 2013 2 ·
Analysis
36reviewed cases analysed
119rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
8cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Smith v. Stater Bros. Markets CA4/1
- Contreras v. Green Thumb Produce Inc.
- So-McKinley v. Organic Roots Temecula CA4/1
- Juarez v. San Bernardino City Unified Sch. Dist.
- City of Perris v. Henry CA4/1
- Brothers v. Heritage Logistics CA4/3
- Mayes v. La Sierra Univ.
- Arista v. County of Riverside CA4/2
- Paulek v. Western Riverside Co. Regional Conservation Auth.
- Paulek v. Western Riverside Co. Regional Conservation Auth.
- Maravilla Center v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. CA4/1
- In re Establishment of The Press-Enterprise
- Thornburg v. Faunce CA4/3
- San Jacinto Z v. Stewart Title Guaranty CA4/3
- San Jacinto Z v. Stewart Title Guaranty CA4/3
- Arroyo v. Riverside Auto Holdings, Inc. CA4/2