
Dana M. Sabraw
Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2003–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 84 vacated 10 reversed 8 reversed in part 7 dismissed 5 remanded 3
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 18 reversed 2 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
civil 63 criminal 62 probate 2 other 1 delinquency 1
By year: 2019 14 · 2010 14 · 2024 11 · 2020 9 · 2011 9 · 2025 8 · 2021 8 · 2007 7 · 2022 6 · 2017 6 · 2008 6 · 2023 5 · 2012 5 · 2009 5 · 2026 4 · 2018 4 · 2016 2 · 2014 2 · 2013 2 · 2006 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Tran v. Berryhill
- Daniel v. San Diego County
- Arline v. Cornejo
- In Re Peters & Freedman
- Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
- Kuhne v. Gossamer Bio, Inc.
- Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
- Botts v. Sheppard
- Doe v. McAleenan
- McCullock v. Scharr
- Foreman v. United States
- Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
- Jody Aliff v. Vervent, Inc.
- Whittington v. Deines
- Dalfio v. Orlansky-Wax, LLC
- Rapinoe v. San Diego County Sheriffs Officer
- Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
- Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
- Mitchell v. Auto Club Life Insurance Company
- Mitchell v. Auto Club Life Insurance Company
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Boucher
- Parker v. United States Probation Office
- Pouliot v. Mechling
- Pruco Life Insurance Company v. California Energy Development, Inc.
- Aliff v. Vervent, Inc.