Jesse W. Curtis, Sr.
Judge, California Supreme Court 1926–1945
A-
100% — 17.0 of 17 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
697opinions authored
769panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1919 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Williams v. Gordon
- Kester v. McNear
- In Re Rosencrantz
- Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San Francisco
- Clark v. Tompkins
- Couture v. Ocean Park Bank
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Carlsen
- Newson v. Hawley
- Wayt v. Patee
- Palmer v. Continental Casualty Co.
- Logan v. Thorne
- Campbell v. Miller
- Hartzell v. Doolittle
- Feraut v. City of Sacramento
- Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Stewart v. Stewart
- McKay v. Lauriston
- Kelly v. Smith
- Finance & Construction Co. v. City of Sacramento
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Lahti v. McMenamin
- Flores v. Fitzgerald
- O'Meara v. Haiden
- Flach v. Fikes
- Bloomquist v. Haley